The Nebulous Kingdom

Citations

1/16/2010

Comments

 
Picture
I just finished writing a 10-page single-spaced essay.  I have much to say on the topic of forced creativity, and value of academic essays in general, but that’s for an 18-and-over audience.  One thing that struck me over the course of this tortuous process was the heavy emphasis placed on citation in the academic realm.

Now in principle, I’m a fan of giving credit where credit is due.  Citations not only assign appropriate credit, but they also allow the reader to trace back the antecedents and provide a roadmap for the intellectual history of the piece of work.  The citation system also inspired the PageRank algorithm that underlies our always-on-hand Google search engine (http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html).  At the heart of both are social systems for building a shared and constantly evolving edifice of knowledge in a distributed fashion.  In addition to credit, they also lend credence and authority -- through an automated algorithm for PageRank, through the social-reputational mechanism for academia.

Yet, as I inserted citation after citation in-line to this monolith (it really took on this Sisyphean flavor), it felt….if not archaic, then at least dated.  The number of citations drastically reduced the readability of the paper, making it hard to glean whatever original insight existed in the sea of parentheticals.  It felt like, at times, I was citing what any reasonable person would call ‘common sense.’  Perhaps a hundred years ago, it wasn’t common sense, but as common sense enters the collective consciousness, when are we allowed to stop giving credit?  Never?

There is this friction between the needs of the piece of work being created and at hand, and the debt we owe to the works that have come before and their authors.  This is a friction that comes especially to the fore in the clash of traditional copyright and digitization (for those interested, Larry Lessig, in his excellent book Free Culture, offers a brilliant, lucid and forward-looking (if not exactly balanced) discussion of these issues).  It is representative of an even larger war between our principled sense of fairness and the pragmatic reality of results, outcomes, phenomena, and emblematic of the breakdown in conversation between the “two cultures” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Cultures).

What struck me about academic citations is that they seem to be structured around attribution, which offers value to a few individuals, rather than authority, which potentially offers value to many.   Citations can lend authority in two ways – substantiation (here is where I got this information) and reputation (this paper is cited elsewhere by practitioners with relevant judgment).  For people immersed in the relevant body of work, this authority is quite clear.  It is, however, challenging for non-practitioners to read a paper and understand its relevance and authority (and for many online resources as well, which suffer from the added suspicion associated with being readily edited).  This problem cannot be underestimated, as the dizzying array of information sources becomes ever more nauseating.  

Can we make these authority mechanisms more explicit, especially the reputational mechanism?  Is it possible to provide simple, cogent, trusted signals of relevance and authority, without resorting to elite curatorship?  For a given piece of work, can I dynamically understand the relevance of what I am absorbing – before and during reading, without distracting from the process of reading?  Can I access in a simple way the whole history of this piece of work, from whence it came and what later constructs used it as a building block?  I focus on long-form text, because despite the advances and advantages of other forms of media, we still haven’t found a better way to manipulate complex concepts than semantic language.  If we can do this for academic publications, perhaps we can take the system and generalize it to solve for at least one dimension of the sticky problem of ‘filter failure.’
Comments
    Picture

    Author

    I'm interested in uncertainty, time, trust, consistency, strategy, economics, empathy, philosophy, education, technology, story-telling, and fractals.
    Contact

    Archives

    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    January 2015
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009

    RSS Feed


    My Favorite Curators


    Email newsletters

    Edge.org
    John Mauldin
    STRATFOR
    Futurity.org
    BPS Research Digest
    Domain-B.com
    FORA.tv
    PopTech!
    PIMCO Investment Outlooks
    GMO Client Reports
    Big Think
    Commonwealth Club
    Someecards.com
    MRN Research Papers
    Chicago Booth eNewsletters
    McKinsey Quarterly
    Boldtype / Artkrush
    Singularity University
    Charlie Rose
    The Aspen Institute


    Feeds

    WNYC
    Radiolab

    This American Life
    Freakonomics Radio
    The Moth
    Chicago Booth Podcast
    The Atlantic Council
    The Memory Palace
    TED.com
    Foreign Affairs
    The Ideas Project
    Long Now Foundation
    The School of Life
    Letters of Note

    Periodicals

    The Economist
    The Wall Street Journal
    The New Yorker
    The New York Times
    Wired Magazine
    The Atlantic

    Other Websites

    Oaktree Capital Memos
    LSE Public Lectures
    Bubblegeneration
    Becker-Posner Blog
    Eric Von Hippel
    NetAge
    John Seely Brown
    Malcolm Gladwell
    John Hagel
    HBR – The Big Shift
    LookBook.nu
    Robert Shiller
    Paul Graham
    Frontline PBS
    Royal Society for the Arts
    Blake Masters

    Humor

    Best of Craigslist
    Texts from Last Night
    FMyLIfe
    MyLifeisAverage
    Lamebook
    The Onion


    Categories

    All