The Nebulous Kingdom

Quick bits

3/26/2012

Comments

 
Sometimes you're in a place where you're your best self, and you respond to what you read in a different way.  Here are a few quick notes about the articles that I read today.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/the-very-real-dangers-of-an-aging-america/254937/
Our country is getting older.  The youth in country are worse educated than they ever were.  And we're denying entry to the vibrant talent we could tap from other countries.  What is left for us?  How can we compete?  I say, we compete from our roots, our socks, our souls.  We take what we've always done best, which is give individuals the space to work and live and create, and strike that happy medium somewhere between the safety net and oppressiveness of the best and worst parent who cares.  We know freedom better than anyone.

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/mar/26/do-we-need-stories/
Most of us were born with the moral pillar of fairness.  We seem to think that  because something is hard, it is intrinsically valuable.  A piece of art labored upon for 20 years is somehow of more value than a photocopy.  A complex story written alone and by candlelight is needed more than the comic strip.  But why?  Maybe because the story of the artist helps us learn and grow.  Maybe.  But I think it's more likely that deep down inside, the five-year-old in us thinks, "Otherwise, it's just not fair."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17511011
Apparently the new news is that chocolate keeps the pounds off.  It's based on data.  But it seems just loonbin crazy to me.   So here's my guess -- we did a study that indicated that people who eat more chocolate tend to weigh less, and we scraped up a hypothesis to justify an otherwise unexplicable result.  If people who eat more chocolate tend to weigh less, then the most likely explanation is that chocolate keeps the pounds off.  No!  This to me is an example of *when science fails*.  We do these crappy two-variable correlations within complex systems, and come out on the other side with explanations that explain nothing except that one correlation.  I don't know the answer but frankly most of the people I know or have met who are overweight are more predisposed to rich food than sweets.  And I don't blame 'em because fried chicken is delicious.

http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/03/the_commoditization_of_scale.html?awid=8398177635185621401-3271
The  big takeaway is right there in the title - scale is becoming commoditized.  Scale was always commoditizable (which is not a word but you get me).  Scale is not a permanent differentiator - but then again, nothing is.  It used to be, though, that scale was hard to come by.   Even when the advantage was obvious to anyone with eyes, it was hard enough to come by that your competitors were hard-pressed to meet you on the battlefield with the same tooling.  Nowadays though, that's no longer the case.  You can pick up scale through networks on the cheap.  Whoa nelly.  It's no surprise that firms are getting smaller:  Average New Establishment Size (1994-2010).
 
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/167817/howard-kurtz-ira-glass-shouldnt-retreat-to-a-no-comment-stance/
I feel for Mike Daisey and how naked he must feel right now.  Sometimes you make a mistake for a very human reason and, despite it being objectively and inarguably wrong, it was human.  Most of us are lucky enough that our darkest shames never come to the full light of day.  I feel in my heart of hearts for what he must be suffering right now, that one of his human shames has come into the blazing light of day.  
 
 
Comments
    Picture

    Author

    I'm interested in uncertainty, time, trust, consistency, strategy, economics, empathy, philosophy, education, technology, story-telling, and fractals.
    Contact

    Archives

    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    January 2015
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009

    RSS Feed


    My Favorite Curators


    Email newsletters

    Edge.org
    John Mauldin
    STRATFOR
    Futurity.org
    BPS Research Digest
    Domain-B.com
    FORA.tv
    PopTech!
    PIMCO Investment Outlooks
    GMO Client Reports
    Big Think
    Commonwealth Club
    Someecards.com
    MRN Research Papers
    Chicago Booth eNewsletters
    McKinsey Quarterly
    Boldtype / Artkrush
    Singularity University
    Charlie Rose
    The Aspen Institute


    Feeds

    WNYC
    Radiolab

    This American Life
    Freakonomics Radio
    The Moth
    Chicago Booth Podcast
    The Atlantic Council
    The Memory Palace
    TED.com
    Foreign Affairs
    The Ideas Project
    Long Now Foundation
    The School of Life
    Letters of Note

    Periodicals

    The Economist
    The Wall Street Journal
    The New Yorker
    The New York Times
    Wired Magazine
    The Atlantic

    Other Websites

    Oaktree Capital Memos
    LSE Public Lectures
    Bubblegeneration
    Becker-Posner Blog
    Eric Von Hippel
    NetAge
    John Seely Brown
    Malcolm Gladwell
    John Hagel
    HBR – The Big Shift
    LookBook.nu
    Robert Shiller
    Paul Graham
    Frontline PBS
    Royal Society for the Arts
    Blake Masters

    Humor

    Best of Craigslist
    Texts from Last Night
    FMyLIfe
    MyLifeisAverage
    Lamebook
    The Onion


    Categories

    All